June 23, 2008
|
Our Performance vs. the Market |
|
|
IR* |
DIA* |
SPY* |
QQQQ* |
|
3 Months |
5.90% |
5.50% |
4.90% |
11.50% |
|
6 Months |
16.70% |
-3.70% |
-6.00% |
-10.00% |
|
1 Year |
42.10% |
-2.26% |
-6.60% |
4.29% |
|
3 Year |
22.00% |
8.40% |
10.20% |
12.38% |
|
5 year |
21.50% |
10.30% |
10.28% |
14.40% |
|
Inception |
25.00% |
1.66% |
-0.40% |
-5.70% |
|
*IR = Our Investment Rate Model used
for market Timing. Dividends are
not included in these returns.
Inception was 1.3.00. Returns as of
5.5.08. 3,5, and inception data are
annualized. |
|
Click here to Review Our Returns |
Making money with market-based
ETFs requires proper market timing. Active
traders should pay careful attention to the
technical trends of the NASDAQ, for example, if
they intend on trading QID or QLD.
Unfortunately for most active traders they
realize that pinpointing exact bottoms or exact
tops within a technical trend is rather futile.
Often, and almost always, established levels of
support or resistance are breached slightly when
they are tested, and this causes problems.
Technical analysts know this far too well.
If support begins to break should we stop
out?
Attempting to pick exact tops or bottoms
using market-based ETFs can be dangerous. Risk controls
are obviously required. The first thing that comes to
mind when the words risk control are mentioned in
conjunction with trading stocks, are stop losses. The
problem with stop losses is that they require constant
attention. First, we all know that market makers can
see our stoploss orders and we all know, arguably, they
take advantage of that knowledge every day. In
addition, if a slight breaches of support or resistance
levels occur and then the market reverses back in the
direction we originally expected after a stoploss has
triggered, we must, prudently, reenter that trade in
order to participate in the move; they process would be:
trigger the trade, stop, and then re-trigger. Not only
do stop losses require quite a bit of work, but they
create excessive commission costs as well. But are
there any alternatives to risk controls?
The strategy set forth below is a prudent
alternative.
Use a balanced approach in conjunction
with Market Timing and Market Based ETFs to control your
risk and make money in any market environment without
making excessive trades, incurring excessive
commissions, or spending excessive amounts of time
watching the strategy.
The risk controls associated with market
timing using market-based EPFs in the strategy below
incorporates a balanced approach to the market. Stop
losses are not used in this strategy. Instead, when a
support level or a resistance level is breached we
balance our original trade with the opposite ETF to
balance our risk. In effect the original trade and the
one that follows wash each other out. Because we are
using market-based ETF_s which perform in the exact
opposite way, and which are triggered near the exact
same market level, making money from these two opposite
trades is futile. IE: Buying QID and QLD near the same
Market level = a wash.
Instead, this balanced approach requires
you to overweight positions in the market based ETF
which correlates with the next leg of direction in the
market. If the market moves higher after testing
support for example the long market based ETF should be
chosen (QLD) to overweight longs as the Market moves up
towards the next level of resistance. If instead the
market moves down after testing support the short
weighted market based ETF should be chosen (QID) to
overweight the original balanced position as the Market
moves down towards the next level of support.
This balanced _ overweight strategy
alleviates the need for stop losses and re-entries but
it still allows you to control your risk and make money
in any Market environment. The process, if slight
breaches of support or resistance levels occur, is to
balance the position and wait for further indications of
direction. It_s not rocket science, and it is very
effective.
You could even do this in an IRA.
This strategy requires you to identify
initial and secondary levels of support and resistance.
If you are able to accurately identify these important
inflection parameters every day then this balanced
trading strategy should work wonderfully to improve your
returns, reduce your commission costs, and alleviate the
time constraints associated with trading at the same
time
The example below is a real-life strategy
from June 23, 2008. The support and resistance
parameters offered in the chart below were provided by
Stock Traders Daily in conjunction with their automated
correlated market timing and stock selection tool. This
tool alerts you when tests of support or resistance
occur and those alerts tell you when to make your
trade. In addition, obviously, the alerts also tell you
if you should be a buyer or a short seller.
As of 2:30 p.m. Eastern time on June 23
this strategy had already returned 2.14% to the end
user. Review the details of this strategy by comparing
the time alerts in the table to real-time market data.
Afterwards you can find more information by visiting
www.stocktradersdaily.com.
Automated Alerts Viewer for 6.23.08
|
2008-06-23 13:49:16 |
Short |
Buy QID again_ |
|
2008-06-23 13:49:13 |
Close |
Sell All + 1.22% |
|
2008-06-23 11:57:15 |
Buy |
Buy QLD 80.15 |
|
2008-06-23 11:20:14 |
Short |
Buy QID 41.75 |
|
2008-06-23 10:54:14 |
Buy |
Buy QLD 79.86 |
|
2008-06-23 10:53:14 |
Close |
Sell All + 0.94% |
|
2008-06-23 10:45:13 |
Short |
Buy QID 41.2 |
|
2008-06-23 10:34:14 |
Buy |
Buy QLD 81 |
|
2008-06-23 10:16:14 |
Short |
Buy QID 41.1 |
|
2008-06-23 00:01:11 |
New Day |
|

http://www.stocktradersdaily.com
|